Wednesday, August 8, 2018

NELSON WADE ROGERS - OBITUARY

Nelson Wade Rogers, formerly of Athens, Alabama, passed away peacefully on Friday, August 3, 2018, surrounded by his family and friends. Visitation will take place at McConnell Funeral Home in Athens from 6-8PM on Monday, August 6, 2018, and the funeral service will take place at McConnell Funeral Home on Tuesday, August 7 at 11 AM, with the burial/committal service to be held immediately thereafter in Roselawn Cemetery at McConnell. Donnie Rogers will officiate the service, and both Donnie Rogers and son Troy Rogers will eulogize Wade. Wade is preceded in death by his wife, Wanda Sue Stanley Rogers, formerly of Roan Mountain, Tennessee; his parents, Willie and Nellie Rogers, of Tanner; a brother, Cecil Rogers, of Huntsville; and a sister, Hazel Brooks, of Athens. 

He is survived by his son and daughter-in-law, Troy and Dr. Tamsie-Coker Rogers, of Killen; a brother, Donnie Rogers, of Elkmont, and a host of nieces and nephews. Beloved family members Tony King, Mike Smith, Jerry Smith, Steve Rogers, Jimmy Rogers, Donnie Rogers and Troy Rogers will serve as pallbearers. In lieu of flowers, please make any donations to the Michael J. Fox Foundation, which funds Parkinson’s research. Donation Processing The Michael J. Fox Foundation P.O. Box 5014 Hagerstown, MD 21741-5014
 
Wade was born on September 8, 1942, to parents Willie and Nellie Rogers, and he grew up in the Reid community, graduating from Tanner High School in 1961, where he was a standout in both varsity football and baseball. He was also as able-bodied a farmhand as he was an athlete, often helping his father, Willie Rogers, in the snow white cotton fields of Tanner after school. Wade attended the Sunny Hill Church of Christ with his family. 

After high school, Wade enlisted in the United States Army, completing basic training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina and then serving his enlistment stateside, ultimately being honorably discharged. Wade’s military training came in handy a short time later, as he graduated from the Alabama Police Academy and joined the Madison Police Department as a patrolman in 1966. That same year, Wade met the love of his life, the former Wanda Sue Stanley of Roan Mountain, Tennessee, at the Monrovia Restaurant in Madison, when he sat down at a table in her waitress section. They quickly grew to fancy each other, falling in love and marrying in November 1966. 

Two short years later, in 1968, Wade was named both the Madison City Police Officer of the Year and Outstanding Peace Officer for the 8th District of Alabama. During this time, Wade also became the first Madison City Officer to train and maintain a full time K-9 unit, his German Shepherd partner Heiko. In January 1969, Wade and Sue would welcome their only child, a son, Troy Nelson Rogers. In 1973, Wade accepted a position as Security Officer at Engelhard, and was quickly promoted to Officer in Charge of Security. He excelled at his job, and was offered an opportunity by Engelhard to attend truck driving school and become one of the Huntsville branch’s inaugural silver nitrate drivers, a position he thoroughly enjoyed until his retirement in 1998. 

Wade also realized early in his Engelhard career that he missed military life, so he enlisted with the Alabama National Guard, and he retired as an E6 Staff Sergeant, serving his entire career with the 1343rd Engineering Battalion, Headquarters Company. Being the consummate family provider and hard worker, Wade also worked part time on weekends for many years as a car salesman for Jack Yarber Ford of Athens. 

Wade was a Christian husband, father, brother and friend, and he was actively involved with the Midway Baptist Church congregation for many years, attending with Sue until she succumbed to cancer in 1998, then for a period of time afterward until moving to Killen to be closer to his son Troy and daughter-in-law, Dr. Tamsie Coker-Rogers. In later years, Wade was a member of the Lee Heights Baptist Church congregation in Florence. 

Wade will be greatly missed, and his daughter-in-law Tamsie and “grandpuppy” Clementine were the apples of his eye. He lived his last 17 months bravely fighting Parkinson’s with dementia at Glenwood Rehabilitation Facility in Florence, where he enjoyed daily, extended visits with his son, his daughter-in-law, and his brother Donnie, as well as other family members and friends. The Glenwood staff became family members to the entire Rogers family during Wade’s stay as a resident, as the love, care and compassion shown to him by the staff was second to none.

DWAINE CLARK - OBITUARY

Dwaine Clark, age 69 of Elkmont, AL died Saturday, August 4, 2018 at Huntsville Hospital, Huntsville, Alabama.

Born Wednesday, March 16, 1949 in Athens, AL, he was the son of Freda Ruf Putman and the late Calvin Clark.

He was preceded in death by his Father; Son, Dustin Clark; and Brother, Dwight Clark and one Grandson.

He is survived by: 

Mother, Freda Putman, Elkmont, AL
Son, Herby (Tatum) Clark, Mount Juliet, TN
Daughter, Daco (Josh) Clifton, Lawrenceburg, TN
Brother, Dennis (Monica) Clark, Athens, AL
Five Granddaughters, One Grandson
Niece, Kayce Clark McCawley, Lawrenceburg, TN
Nephews, Dylan and Gage Clark, Elkmont, AL, and Cal Clark, Pulaski, TN.

Visitation will be held on Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at Ardmore Chapel Funeral Home, from 5:00 PM until 8:00 PM.

A Funeral Service will be held on Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 11 AM at Ardmore Chapel Funeral Home, with Bro. Jack Bailey officiating. Burial will be in Germantown Cemetery, Athens, AL.

SHIRLEY ANN HODGES - OBITUARY

Shirley Ann Hodges, age 70 of Elkmont, AL died Thursday, August 2, 2018 at Vanderbilt Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee.

Born Monday, February 23, 1948 in Pulaski, TN, she was the daughter of the late Billy Gene Townsend and Emma Jean AlsupTownsend. She lived in the Ardmore area most all her life and loved her wiener dogs.

She was preceded in death by her Parents; Brothers, Larry Dean and Aubrey Wayne Townsend; Infant Sister, Peggy Jean Townsend, and Son, James Townsend,

She is survived by her husband of 24 years, Dennis Hodges, Elkmont, AL; Daughter, Debbie Davis, Florence, AL, Brother, Billy Wilson Townsend, Anthony Hill, TN; Sisters, Debbie Wise, Anderson, AL, Judy Bassham, Anderson, AL,and Nancy Hayes, Anthony Hills, TN: 3 Grandchildren and 5 Great-Grandchildren.

A Celebration Of Life Memorial Service will be held on Saturday, August 4, 2018 at Ardmore Chapel Funeral Home, Ardmore, AL, from 4 to 6 PM.

SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT..... ITS ALWAYS GOOD TO READ DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES

We have the left media, we have the right media but there are other points of views still ... what do you think?


Millions live and die and never know that their lives are regulated by unseen authority. Every detail of our lives is prescribed. Doctors, lawyers, Indians or chiefs, we are regimented into the system. What is the system? It is the totality of laws, regulations, social pressures and morality which regulate our lives, including our very thoughts. It is hammered into our consciousness for 13 years of public school, four years (or more) of college, and by the propaganda media which saturates our daily lives. Some call the system democracy. Some call the system Americanism. Most believe that we are free and that our freedom is guaranteed by the Constitution.

Few people know that the words peace, freedom, and democracy are hammered away at our psyches to actually cause us to give up peace and freedom by sacrificing our individuality and private assets to the manipulated crowd and, of course, their global masters. Hypocrisy among the social elite is "public policy." It is no different anywhere in the world. You can track 'em like the vapor trail of a jet. Their words and phrases are a dead giveaway to their socialist vent. Adolf Hitler forced Field Marshall Erwin Rommel to commit suicide and eulogized him with a state funeral and as a national hero in the Nazi press. It was a masterpiece of cynicism and hypocrisy. Rommel, a brilliant military strategist, totally failed to recognize his place in the global strategy. He was not a politician and he didn't know the right words and phrases and he was sacrificed like common cattle.

Meanwhile back here in American democracy we have Senators Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer, Representatives Paul Ryan and Nancy Pelosi, to name a few, who know the party lines and never tire of uttering the code words and phrases of those who pull their strings. Will we ever learn that the interest of invisible internationalists and their politicians is diametrically opposite to ours? Of course, they don't tell us this. They instead manipulate our minds with high sounding, patriotic words and phrases that subtly channel us against our best private interest. The propaganda is so successful that the politicians are motivated to unashamedly clamor for more and more government, less and less freedom under some ludicrous pretense. Instead of being recognized as traitors, they are re-elected.
 
The much overworked term, "human rights," is the granddaddy of all hypocrisy. What does "human rights" in America really mean when spouted by the politicians? As in all political speak it means exactly the opposite of how it sounds. Here is what it means: A nation steadily moving toward the total sacrifice of human freedom. It means a nation of people being forced into mass medication, inoculation and fluoride and chlorine in the drinking water. It means the commercialization of food and "health" care that promotes degenerative disease and prohibits medical freedom. It means the constant bombardment of propaganda to maintain establishment thought and establishment morality over individual self-determination. It means the constant transfer of your production to the nonproducing elite and their politicians. Finally, "human rights" means all that can be imagined to turn the individual into the faceless masses.
What is in the mind of a politician that his politics are treason? The word is depravity that comes out of his own belief of his own lies which are imparted to him by the system.

Our lives are an expression of the confluence (the blending of influences) of the establishment. We do not feel or see the regimentation and the bridled force that programs our lives to produce for the system which George Orwell called "Big Brother." We unconsciously give our minds and bodies to the system. We literally give our labor for numbers on pieces of paper that some influence told us was money. Through force and regulation these numbers imply confidence that we can exchange for bread. The illusion is compounded when we are forced to return some of the numbers to government as "taxes." Yes, we live and die with abstract numbers which the system has taught us is money. But the system has not taught us or revealed to us that the system created these numbers. They cost the system nothing.  These numbers that we sell our bodies and souls for is the heartbeat of the system. No one dares inquire into the source of these numbers. The fraud and deceit is too big to discuss, too powerful to challenge and too incredible to imagine. The system has omitted any challenge to itself.

Then there is you, the Bob Livingston Alerts reader, as part of that very small number who have become aware of the force that disciplines our lives. Your inquiry has filtered through the layers of manipulation and misinformation. You have actually seen a great loss of liberty. You are able to see what millions cannot, that wealth and production flows to the corporate state.
You are the few who have awareness and mental freedom. You have escaped the illusion of the system. Awareness by itself is the foundation of freedom. But for the grace of God you, too, would be in the unconscious crowd.

Yours for the truth,
Bob Livingston
Bob Livingston
Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter™

ELKMONT CROSS COUNTRY TEAM BACK FROM CAMP

The Elkmont Cross Country team had their annual "before school" team training camp in the beautiful hills of Tennessee in July.  Lots of fun, team bonding and running up and down hills, help these dedicated runners get ready for the upcoming cross country season this fall. Coach Pugh's thoughts about camp can be found below.

Sunday:
This is what makes my heart glad. We’ll have a devotional at 6 and then a 6 mile run before supper. The work begins again at 7 am in the morning. This bonding is a big reason for bringing these kids to camp. The faces have changed over the the years but the laughter and the friendships forged during this week remain the same !! Can’t wait to get started. XC camp 2018!!  

Monday:
3 mile tempo trail run always ends in the creek. Great work and great times!!


  
Tuesday: 
Only sad thing about camp...it’s the last for some! Seniors with their old coach after the mid day trail run! 29 miles since Sunday night! Everyone is doing great!


Wednesday:
35 miles and few more runs to go! Can’t say enough about the kids from Elkmont and Ardmore and the hard work they have put in. Headed out for a 6 mile in a few! A little cooler!


Thursday:
9 miler completed.! Last day! 50 miles total!! Great run with great kids! Great kids who care about each other and our team! "I wouldn't trade this time with them for anything." 


The EHS XC is looking good for 2018 season.  Coach Barry Pugh, their fearless leader, brings lots of infectious enthusiasm to camp as he pushes them along.  Special thanks goes to the parents and other adults that helped the cross country team have a great time.


Cross Country Mom Thoughts:
I wanted to say a HUGE THANK YOU to Barry L Pugh and the other ladies and gentlemen that helped at Davy Crockett Cross Country Camp this year. It was Preston 1st year and everyone made him feel right at home. He loved it and when he came home last night He was talking about running today. He absolutely loves it. Mr. Pugh is a wonderful coach and person I feel confident with my son being with him. He always inspires and always has something nice to say to and about everyone. I am proud for us to be part of the ELKMONT CROSS COUNTRY TEAM FOR 2018. Preston got a award with STRENGTH. Thank u again for all your hard work with the Running Red Devils.  

BARRY'S CORNER - LIVING IN ELKMONT


It’s 12 am, the first day of school. Of course, I can’t get to sleep. So many years of these “first day’s” sleepless nights. Always thinking of things I haven’t done and going through a million scenarios of “what if’s”. So many kids have walked thorough my gym...my life. Rarely do I go somewhere that I do not run into one of them. Always a smile comes to my face when a 6’2” bearded man becomes the kindergartner who ran on the playground not so long ago. I guess as we age we get more sentimental...more retrospective...more appreciative. 

Few have the privilege of sharing lives of so many. Few have the memories of watching scared little girls and boys becoming athletes and artists, friends and leaders, and mothers and fathers. Some have become co-workers of mine. I’ve got to watch it all. Keep the kids and teachers, including myself, close in your thoughts today. We all need the encouragement. Today is a new beginning. The last first day for some of “my” kids as well as the the first “first” day for some of mine. New school years always bring a new hope for good things. Different this year; I’ll be teaching alone for the first time in a while; Gonna miss my friend. But all things change.....adapting is what teachers do best. Better get some sleep,,,gonna be “herding” kittens in the morning! Have a good one!

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT..... ITS ALWAYS GOOD TO READ DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES

We have the left media, we have the right media but there are other points of views still ... what do you think?


Before I jump into this subject matter, I should probably address a common misconception among people who are new to liberty movement activism. The first time people hear about the concept of the "false left/right paradigm," they wrongly assume that there is "no left or right ideology," that it is all made up to divide the masses. This is false. The false left/right paradigm pertains to the elitists at the top of the political and financial pyramid. These people do not have any loyalty to any one political party or to the beliefs of one side or the other. They are happy to exploit leftists or conservatives in order to create a social outcome that elevates the elitist's own goals, but that is all. Meaning, these people are globalists and have their own agenda separate from the political left or right, but will pretend to stand on one side or the other in order to control the narrative. Hence, the "falseness" of their particular left/right theater.
 
The common citizen, however, does indeed legitimately rest his or her ideals on a spectrum from left to right, from progressive to conservative. And lately, the separation between these two sides has been growing ever wider. So, it is not playing into the hands of the globalists to point out the differences in the two sides. The two sides are concrete, they are a natural extension of human thought processes, and they would exist even if the globalists did not exist.
Where things go horribly wrong is when one side or the other is pushed artificially towards zealotry. This is where the globalists create chaos, by influencing the left or the right into subverting their own principles and abandoning diplomacy in the name of destroying the other side.  This is when disagreements become war and the political process becomes a blood feud.

Globalists sometimes attempt to conjure such violent conditions when they want to wipe the slate clean and introduce a new social system. Generally, their goal is even more centralization and control. In some cases, being avid eugenicists, their goal is to aggressively reduce the population. In the past few years I have been critical of both sides of the political spectrum, and sometimes even more critical of liberty activists when I see the movement being led astray by disinformation. The reality is that both leftists and conservatives sense severe imbalances in the way our society and our government functions. Where we differ greatly is in how each side places blame for our problems and how they plan to solve those imbalances. In order to understand why the left and the right are so close to outright war, we have to step outside the political bubble and look at our differences in a more objective way. First, let's start with an examination of the leftist mindset.

How leftists view the world 

The key to understanding leftists resides in their inclination toward collectivism as a means of protection and power. To put it more bluntly, leftists love and embrace the mob mentality. This is why the political left seems to organize so much more effectively than conservatives in most cases. While conservatives engage in internal debates with each other over principles and practical solutions, leftists are far more single-minded in their pursuit of social influence. They seem to gravitate to each other like ants around a sugar cube, and in this they can be effective in removing obstacles. This could be considered a strength and a weakness, though.

The leftists ideal is one in which all people are in general agreement — they think all people are tied together in a great social chain, that every individual action has consequences for everyone else in that chain and, therefore, all individual actions no matter how small should be regulated in order to avoid one person adding to a potential disaster for the rest of humanity. Thus, the notion of "society" becomes a control mechanism for leftists. "We are all part of this society, whether we like it or not." They often say, "People have to accept the rules for the greater good of the greater number."
Obviously, this is a brand of totalitarianism posing as humanitarian rationality. Who decides what is the "greater good?" Well, our inherent conscience does that, but conscience is an individual trait. When mobs get together and engage in mob thinking, conscience tends to go out the window.

This is why it is impossible to institute such a thing as "social justice;" arbitrarily homogenizing an entire group based on their skin color, sexual orientation, financial status, etc. and then deciding how they should be rewarded (or punished) erases the individual accomplishments and crimes of the people within that group you just created. It is true that some behaviors tend to be cultural, and in that case, the most we can do morally is point out those behaviors and applaud or criticize. In the case of globalists, you have an actual example of organized criminality within a definable group of people. This can indeed be judged on a broad scale but still must be punished based on individual actions.
We can judge an individual for his behavior, but no one on Earth is devoid of bias, and no one on Earth has the omnipotent wisdom required to dole out punishment or prizes to an entire subculture of people en masse.

Leftists with good intentions desire a world without suffering. This is perhaps a noble thing. Unfortunately, that world does not exist and never will. There will always be inequality of outcome, because not all people are equal in ability or willpower. I realize that leftists have been brainwashed into thinking that all people are equally capable, if not completely the same in every imaginable way. But believing this does not make it fact. The best we can hope for is the freedom to pursue prosperity as individuals, but in their pursuit of total equality, leftists are encouraging the erasure of individual freedom and opportunity. They believe that what is best for the individual is for him to sacrifice his individualism for the sake of the mob. When one understands that the mob is morally relative, that it has no soul or conscience, this suggestion sounds like madness. And frankly, it is madness. Needless to say, the collectivist thinking of leftists makes them easy prey for sociopathic global elites. That said, conservatives are also targeted for manipulation exactly because they present the most viable threat to the success of globalism as construct.

How conservatives view the world

While the political left is essentially going off the deep end into the errors of zealotry, conservatives are also not immune to ideological blindness. It is no secret that I view the conservative position as far superior to that of the left — I will summarize the strengths of this position as briefly as possible so that we can get to the more important issue of weaknesses.

The left sees the world as a Gordian Knot that must be chopped in half to be untangled. Conservatives see society's problems as much simpler. Each individual's problems are his own. Each individual must work hard to elevate himself and to solve his problems without taking from other people in the process. Each person is an island, and while we might ally with each other at times, we are not permanently tied to each other in some kind of endless symbiotic relationship. As the Non-Aggression Principle outlines, you leave me alone, and I'll leave you alone, and as long as no one is attempting to steal from me or murder me I will remain quiet and peaceful. The conservative dynamic goes wrong, though, when conservatives abandon their own principles for the sake of winning a fight against an imminent threat.

As leftists worship the mob and government power, conservatives tend to worship heroes, some of them false prophets. Conservatives are always desperately searching for the man on the white horse to lead them to the promise land. They are always looking for another messiah.  And in this they make themselves weak. What they should be emulating are their principles and heritage alone. Only ideals and truths matter, because they are eternal, and they do not lie. But let the right showman or mascot come along reciting the correct rhetoric in a rousing way, and many conservatives become putty in the hands of the political elites.

I believe this is owed to the problem of organization that conservatives suffer from. Individualists do not always agree on everything and normally abhor group think. The political right grows frustrated at how easy it is for leftists to congeal into an effective mob, and the tyranny of the majority is horrifying to the average conservative. So, in response conservatives seek out unifying leaders, people that appear to hold the same values and who conservatives can pour all their hopes and dreams for the future into. When this happens, group think can and does spread like a cancer through the political right.

When conservatives hyper-focus on leadership, they unwittingly centralize and become easily controlled. Globalists can either co-opt the leader or they can destroy the leader and thus the hopes of all the people that were invested in him. They can use the leader as a placebo, making conservatives sit idle waiting around for things to change when they should be taking action themselves.
Globalists can also tie all the perceived or real blunders of that leader around the necks of his political base; meaning, conservatives can be conned into rallying around a false prophet and then when he falls from grace, all conservative thought falls from grace as well.

When conservatives bottleneck all their efforts and energy into a single leader, they set themselves up for failure. Organization does not need to be pursued from the top down. It can be built from the ground up in a decentralized way. When conservatives ignore their own principles and start centralizing, some very ugly things can happen. Zealotry is not only a vice of leftists. I remember the insanity of the Iraq War, for example, and in that event I saw self-proclaimed conservatives acting like the very mob they used to despise. This happened because they were frightened by an imminent threat and sought out leadership in all the wrong places instead of thinking critically.

The two sides of the political spectrum are a fact of life, unless of course the globalists get their way and erase everything. One side is often used against the other to illicit a self-destructive response. Understanding where each side is coming from helps us to remain vigilant and to avoid exploitation by the powers that be.

To truth and knowledge,
image
Brandon Smith

IT'S SCHOOL TIME


It's about that time!!! School starts on August 8th with our school opening our doors at 7:30 am. 



Our janitors have been working hard all summer to get the building clean, floors shining and they look so good. Our teachers are starting to get their classrooms ready to greet those smiling faces!!! 



As I look forward to this year, I'm reminded how fast time flies and what a awesome job we have. It seems like only yesterday that my own children started school and now one has graduated and the other is a junior. You will never regret the quality time you spent with your children during this school year, re-enforcing skills taught at school. I know together we can prepare our next generation to be ready and able to face the challenges that lie ahead. 


In closing, I would like to invite the community and you to visit and be our active partners at Elkmont High School. I fully understand the importance of the job we have at hand, to love and educate our children. With your help, I know we can be successful and have one of the best years yet!!! 

Thank you
Bill Tribble Principal

Monday, August 6, 2018

BARRY'S CORNER - LIVING IN ELKMONT


Man...this picture brings back so many memories. This is a painting of my grandparents house that stood on the corner of Parker and New Cut Roads. My cousins and neighbors who were like Cousins and I spent endless hours playing in the yard. We played kick ball, super hero’s, matchbox cars and even The Price is Right for hours. We were hot and sweaty, but a drink from the old water spicket under the grape vine was all it took to cool us off. 

The old metal bed of Grandaddy’s ‘56 Dodge was our train engine and when our bare feet couldn’t take the hot metal anymore we would run down to “Pumpkin’s Den”. This was down by the tree house where an old Maple had partially uprooted during a storm. It was named for one of the many yard dogs that found a cool place to lay over the years. Grandmother chopping the weeds from the rows of corn and Grandaddy tilling in between tomato vines staked with whatever he could find were daily happenings that calms me even today. 

On days like today when I feel the warm breeze and smell fresh cut grass these memories and these people come back in the old squeaking screen door in my mind. I love those memories...I love those people even more ...So glad I grew up in a time when “outside” was the best phrase around. Kids today are missing out on something...we had it good! Have a good one!

Saturday, August 4, 2018

SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT..... ITS ALWAYS GOOD TO READ DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES

We have the left media, we have the right media but there are other points of views still ... what do you think?
 

The past two years have seen a rather aggressive change in corporate policies toward the very customers they used to covet. In the past, corporate heads tended to keep their political views mostly in the closet. Companies remained publicly neutral because their goal was first and foremost to make money. When they wanted to influence politics or social norms, they bought politicians — you know, the good old-fashioned way. The big banks still do this by funneling cash to both Republicans and Democrats alike
However, in the wake of the social justice cult frenzy some companies have decided that ideology is more important than profit, and most of these companies are deeply involved in media.
Some people will argue that the media has always been leftist in its orientation and that this trend is nothing new. But, I think it is clear to anyone who has worked in countering mainstream media disinformation that something is very different today. 

Conservatives are being "cleansed" from participation in these communications platforms, and conservative ideals are being erased or misrepresented on a massive scale. Not long ago, media companies at least pretended to be "fair and balanced" by tolerating a certain level of participation by conservatives. No longer.
With the advent of the internet and social media, participation in political discussion has become more open to the common citizen than ever before. This is apparently an intolerable side effect that corporate elites would like to do away with.

It is a slightly complex problem, so I'll try to break it down point by point:

First, companies like Facebook and Twitter are not honest in the presentation of their own image. They depict themselves as bastions of social commerce without any interest in ideological battles. If they had come right out in the open and admitted they are running their platforms based on social justice lunacy, then perhaps conservatives would not have bothered to join in the first place. Then Facebook and others could keep their forums "ideologically pure" without misleading people.

Second, while these companies do have standards of behavior and rules for participants, the rules are deliberately broad and vaporous. They claim their rules focus on more abhorrent behaviors like overt racism, but then go on to define almost everything that they disagree with as "racist." This includes most conservative viewpoints and arguments. Therefore, it appears that social media corporations want to fool as many people as possible into joining their platforms, get them addicted to participation, and then companies want to have the option of controlling those people's behavior through the fear of losing access.

Third, while this is clearly ideological zealotry, social media websites are also private property. They can invite people in, and they can ask people to leave anytime they wish. If conservatives are going to argue in favor of private property rights and voluntary participation rights, then they must include private websites in this.

So then, what is the solution?
Some will claim that social media giants represent a public utility rather than private property and that they should be subjected to regulation by government in terms of political discrimination. I disagree. Giving government even more intrusive powers into how businesses function from day to day is not the answer. Allowing government to indiscriminately label a business or website a "public utility" is essentially nationalization of private property; something very common in communist countries but a habit that should be avoided in America. We need less government and less bureaucracy, not more, and conservatives need to remember that while leftists present a constant annoyance, it is big government that remains the ultimate threat to individual freedom.
They may start with Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc., but where does it stop? How long before government is enforcing participation rules on all websites? How long before conservative websites are required to allow leftist trolls to rampage through their forums without any recourse to remove them?  How long before government shifts over to the other side of the aisle and conservatives start kicking themselves for passing laws that are then used against them.

That said, there are some issues with corporations in general that need to be addressed. For example, some corporations are not normal businesses. Corporations only exist because of government charter and protections like limited liability. This is where hardcore Anarcho-capitalists tend to go wrong in their rabid defense of corporations and monopolies. The reality is that corporations are a product of government and are not a natural function of free markets. Facebook has received considerable government aid. For years Facebook has been offered special tax breaks to the extent that in some cases they have avoided taxes to the IRS altogether. Show me how many small-business owners get that kind of treatment from the government? Facebook has also allowed intrusive data mining operations including government operations and corporate operations to spy on its users and has so far suffered little consequences beyond a slap on the wrist. Facebook has even maintained partnerships with foreign entities considered national security threats to the U.S.

This does not mean that companies like Facebook should be nationalized and turned into public utilities in a socialist free-for-all. But it does mean that corporations should not exist in the form they do today. I would first advocate for the end of the legal protections afforded under "corporate personhood." When a company like Facebook is sued or prosecuted for its trespasses and criminality, the company itself is treated as if it is a legal person. Mark Zuckerberg and his ilk are not punished: the company is punished. This usually ends in fines which amount to nothing more than pocket change. Under Adam Smith's model of free markets, corporations (or joint stock companies as they were called in his day), were not acceptable. As mentioned, they are not a function of free markets. Partnerships are, though. Reducing corporations down to partnerships and removing corporate welfare and government protections would go a long way in solving the dangers of business elites and their control of entire swaths of public communication (among many other sectors).

This is why I am also a proponent of the breakup of corporate monopolies. If a corporation, aided by government in numerous ways, becomes so large and influential that free market competition with that company is impossible, then it should be broken up by government into separate competing companies so that there is more incentive to keep customers rather than discriminate against them. This is just one solution to the problem of social media outlets that are attempting to cut out one-half of the American public.

If the breakup of monopolies is not possible, or if one company is separated into competing parts and these parts still cling to ideological zealotry rather than pursuing sound business practices, then it is up to conservatives themselves to create an alternative.
That's right — I'm saying it's time for a conservative (or truly neutral) Facebook, a conservative Twitter, a conservative YouTube, etc.

More government domination of business is not an option, and it's certainly not conservative in spirit. What is conservative in spirit is industry and self-reliance. I see no reason why a conservative or neutral social media outlet would not be financially successful, as long as it is not interfered with by government. If the system is not offering a necessity or service, or it is restricting a necessity or service, then it is up to free people to provide that necessity or service for themselves instead of relying on others to do it for them.

I do fear that that the social justice aggression within corporations against conservatives is part of a larger and more subversive plan. If one studies the leftist tactics of socialist gatekeeper Saul Alinsky, one would discover that they often use the strategy of harassing their enemies to illicit a vicious overreaction. Meaning, it may be the goal of the leftists or globalists (who have no loyalty to either) to manipulate conservatives through their own anger. Conservatives are portrayed as evil and monstrous tyrants, or as dumb bumbling bigots in most current media. The social justice ideology is placed on a pedestal as unassailable and untouchable in movies, television shows and even commercials. It is treated as absolute truth that cannot be questioned or debated. In the meantime, social media companies seek to gain vast market share of communications spaces and then reduce conservative presence there so that we cannot argue our side of the issues.
 
I get it. There is every reason for conservatives to be pissed off. But, we need to look at the bigger picture. It is possible that the goal on the part of these companies is not necessarily to merely silence conservative voices on their forums or to slander us in ridiculous misrepresentations. It could be that they hope we will become enraged, and that we will respond by abandoning our own principles to attack them back. They want us to become the monsters that they are portraying us as. Even if we win, we lose.
I have already outlined examples of how we can fight back without breaking our own ideals and morals. The fight is not just over modes of communication, it is over conscience and identity. The latter cannot be sacrificed to obtain the former.

To truth and knowledge,
image