10/04/13
Washington, D.C. – This morning Congressman Mo Brooks (AL-05) spoke on the House floor and renewed his demand that President Obama obey the “Pay Our Military Act” and stop unlawfully furloughing 400,000 Department of Defense civilian personnel.
Congressman Brooks said, “The Pay Our Military Act unambiguously bars furloughs of civilian defense workers if those workers ‘are providing support to members of the Armed Forces’. Under the Pay Our Military Act, there is no requirement that defense workers be declared ‘essential’. There is no requirement that they support Armed Forces who are in combat. If they ‘are providing support to members of the Armed Forces’, then they should not be furloughed. By definition, supporting America’s Armed Forces is exactly what defense workers do.”
Congressman Brooks added, “I am proud that 68 Congressmen have joined in a letter to the Secretary of Defense and Office of Management and Budget reminding them of the Pay Our Military Act obligations and demanding that they return civilian defense employees ‘to work without delay’.”
Brooks concluded, “President Obama is America’s chief law enforcement officer and chief executive officer. This is not ObamaCare. President Obama should obey the law just like everyone else. Instead, President Obama persists in unlawful conduct that degrades America’s national security, all for purely partisan, political gain.”
Video of Congressman Brooks’ remarks is available HERE.
Text of Congressman Brooks’ remarks:
“Mr. Speaker, according to the Department of Defense, ‘of the department’s 800,000 civilian workers, about half will be furloughed.’ That means President Obama, our Commander-in-Chief, in his sole discretion, publicly declared that roughly 400,000 DoD civilian employees are not ‘essential’ to America’s national security.
“Mr. Speaker, President Obama’s furloughing 400,000 civilian defense workers violates the law while putting national security at greater risk. Let me explain.
“If any one of three circumstances exist, then America’s defense workers should not be furloughed.
“The first circumstance is if Congress passes a defense appropriation bill, then the military is funded and the President has no legal basis for using the shutdown as an excuse for furloughing defense workers. Unfortunately, this first circumstance does not exist.
“While the House of Representatives, four months ago, passed the National Defense Authorization Act, on a 315-108 bipartisan vote that included 103 Democrats, and while the House, almost three months ago, passed the Defense Appropriations Bill, on a 315-109 bipartisan vote that included 95 Democrats, President Obama, Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and their allies, refuse to allow the Senate to vote on either bill that would both fully restore defense funding lost because of sequestration and fully fund America’s national security.
“The second circumstance exists if President Obama declares defense workers ‘essential’. While I disagree and question why any Commander-in-Chief, in his sole discretion, would slight 400,000 defense workers by declaring them superfluous to America’s national security, President Obama did just that. Hence, the second circumstance does not prevent furloughs of civilian defense workers during this shutdown.
“Which brings us to the third circumstance, the Pay Our Military Act. This Act not only forces the President to pay our men and women in uniform, it does more, much more. It also bars the President from furloughing civilian defense workers even if there is a government shutdown, even if they are not declared ‘essential’, and even if Congress has not passed its Defense Appropriations bill.
“For those who wish to read it, Google the ‘Pay Our Military Act’ to confirm that what I say is true.
“The Pay Our Military Act states, in part and I quote: ‘There are hereby appropriated for fiscal year 2014 . . . . such sums as are necessary to provide pay and allowances to . . . . civilian personnel of the Department of Defense … whom … are providing support to members of the Armed Forces.’
“Let me repeat that for emphasis. It states, ‘There are hereby appropriated for fiscal year 2014 . . . . such sums as are necessary to provide pay and allowances to . . . . civilian personnel of the Department of Defense … whom … are providing support to members of the Armed Forces.’
“There is no requirement that civilian defense workers be ‘essential’. The only requirement is that they ‘provide support to members of the Armed Forces.’ For emphasis, there is also no requirement that the support be for Armed Forces who are in combat.
“Mr. Speaker, every single civilian defense worker supports the Armed Forces. By definition, that is their entire job! Hence, as a matter of law, there should be no furloughs of any civilian defense workers.
“Mr. Speaker, earlier this week, on October 1st, I joined 67 other Congressmen in a letter to Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security reminding them of the Pay Our Military Act, and emphasizing that we are ‘disheartened that the Administration chose to needlessly furlough workers against the intent of Congress’ [and that], ‘Since all DoD. . . civilian employees serve to support the uniformed services, all of these civilians should be returned to work without further delay.’
“Mr. Speaker, the President, our commander-in-chief, is actively violating the Pay Our Military Act. The Obama Administration must immediately return all 400,000 furloughed DoD workers to work. Why? Mr. Speaker, because it’s the law.”
No comments:
Post a Comment